UDC 631
The authors have identified and considered in detail the most significant programs and strategies at various levels (federal, departmental, regional), which makes it possible to assess the completeness of the measures taken and identify the barriers to the effective development of agriculture at a specific level. At the regional level, the implemented programs are presented using the example of the Leningrad region, which was chosen due to the fact that it is the most active entity in the Non-Chernozem region, which, despite the lack of highly fertile soils, is a leader in the production of products in certain agricultural sectors, and also successfully implements initiatives of the Ministry of Agriculture of Russia. The results of the implementation of strategies and programs have been analyzed, statistical data have confirmed the existence of problems and the insufficient effectiveness of the measures taken, as the negative trend regarding the state of agriculture and rural development has increased in recent years. Specific measures aimed at integrated rural development and sustainable agricultural development are proposed.
agricultural industry, integrated development, agricultural land, government programs, and strategies
1. Baranova D.V., Biryuk E.S. Adaptaciya mezhdunarodnyh praktik funkcionirovaniya malyh form hozyaystvovaniya k usloviyam Rossiyskoy Federacii // Beneficium. 2026. № 1(58). S. 9-19. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.34680/BENEFICIUM.2026.1(58).9-19.
2. Kosinskiy P.D., Yurzina T.A. Kompleksnoe razvitie sel'skih territoriy ugledobyvayuschego regiona: problemy i resheniya // Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. 2024. № 3. S. 53-57. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17513/fr.43581.
3. Krasulya A.D., Tarchokov T.A., Plotnikova E.V. Strategicheskie prioritety razvitiya sel'skogo hozyaystva v Rossiyskoy Federacii // Prikladnye ekonomicheskie issledovaniya. 2026. № 1. S. 113-118. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.47576/2949-1908.2026.1.1.013.
4. Mahmadov A.V., Hantimirov S.S. Problemy kompleksnogo razvitiya sel'skih territoriy Rossiyskoy Federacii // Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo zaochnogo universiteta. 2023. № 45(50). S. 63-66.
5. Nosov A.V., Pozubenkova E.I. Problemy kompleksnogo razvitiya sel'skih territoriy // Vestnik agrarnoy nauki. 2019. № 5(80). S. 94-98. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15217/issn2587-666X.2019.5.94.
6. Semin A.N., Zorkov V.S. Kompleksnoe razvitie sel'skih territoriy: problemy i novye vozmozhnosti // Agroprodovol'stvennaya politika Rossii. 2023. № 3(106). S. 39-43. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.35524/2227-0280_2023_03_39.
7. Stenogramma parlamentskih slushaniy na temu «O merah po povysheniyu effektivnosti vovlecheniya v oborot zemel' sel'skohozyaystvennogo naznacheniya i o praktike primeneniya mehanizma iz'yatiya zemel'nyh uchastkov iz zemel' sel'skohozyaystvennogo naznacheniya, ne ispol'zuemyh po celevomu naznacheniyu» 19 aprelya 2024 goda [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://council.gov.ru/media/files (data obrascheniya: 08.05.2026).
8. Turashbekov N.A., Kalykova B.B., Ordabaeva G.K. Razvitie sel'skih territoriy v usloviyah realizacii agrarnoy politiki // Problemy agrorynka. 2023. № 4. S. 66-74.
9. Usenko L.N., Tarasov A.N., Sun' Yu. Ugrozy i riski kompleksnogo razvitiya sel'skih territoriy: sostoyanie i puti preodoleniya // Uchet i statistika. 2021. № 2(62). S. 8-23. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.54220/1994-0874.2021.62.2.001.
10. Hlystun V.N. Rol' zemleustroystva v organizacii racional'nogo ispol'zovaniya i ohrany zemel'nogo potenciala strany // Plodorodie. 2024. № 3(138). S. 5-9. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.24412/1994-8603-2024-3138-5-9.
11. Yanbyh R.O strategii ustoychivogo razvitiya sel'skih territoriy Rossiyskoy Federacii na period do 2030 goda // Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii. 2015. T. 22, № 5. S. 50-55.
